As the software development arena is undergoing continuous transformations, complete test coverage is important to ship high-quality products. Nevertheless, however meticulous we may be in our testing strategy, there will still always be places that fall through the cracks. Hence this is where the gap analysis in automation testing becomes an indispensable tool in the quality assurance hands.

Gap Analysis in Software Testing

Gap analysis is a systematic way of discovering gaps or disparities between desired outcome and how we test today. In the world of software testing, I believe it helps the teams uncover where existing test cases are missing, whether manual or automated. Pointing out these blind spots enables organizations to strengthen their testing strategies and reduce the risk of problems which haven’t been caught in testing slipping into production.

Effective Gap Analysis Key Techniques

Requirements Traceability Matrix

Finding an RTM for mapping test cases for specific requirements is a powerful tool. Testers can produce a matrix that quickly allows them to identify the requirements with no associated test cases. This technique is very helpful to check that all the functional and non-functional requirements found their way in the testing phase.

Code Coverage Analysis

For this, we use code coverage tools that with this give us insights into which parts of the codebase are exercised during test execution. The data allowed for teams to analyze this and find code sections that haven’t been tested or those that have been tested sparsely and then create more test cases for improved coverage on those sections. As gap analysis for automation testing, this technique is very advantageous as it can help optimize automated tests suites.

Risk-Based Testing

Altering these priorities means concentrating your testing efforts according to the risks you perceive. By performing a robust risk assessment teams can uncover areas representing high risk that may merit additional testing attention. This way critical features are scrutinized enough to effectively prevent major problems from slipping through.

Exploratory Testing Sessions

Automated tests are great at what they do; telling you that things are broken quickly, repeatedly and uniformly, but they can fail to test the things you need them to test based on human intuition. Now it’s a good idea to weave in regular exploratory testing sessions so you don’t overlook edge cases or user experience issues that automated tests won’t catch.

User Feedback Analysis

User feedback, bug report and support tickets can provide patterns of problems not currently being covered by current testing practices. This real work data is very useful to identify gaps in your test scenarios and user workflows that need more coverage.

Gap analysis therefore plays an important role in allowing for exhaustive testing of software in the current fast evolving software environment. As for risk-based testing, exploratory sessions, and user feedback analysis, most of the QA teams face a situation when they are unable to identify the weaknesses of their testing approach, thus to detect them, it is possible to use the requirements traceability matrices and code coverage analysis. Opkey improves this process with the help of AI advanced features such as test discovery options, predictive analytics, real covered area reporting, and test case generation options. This new concept converts gap analysis into a perpetual and system-based process of checking to guarantee that no part during development is left uncovered for testing while at the same time the development progress is not slowed. Opkey’s advantage can be leveraged to enable organizations to detect these gaps and ensure they are filled, thereby providing better quality software products.

Disclaimer: This article is part of sponsored content programme. The Tribune is not responsible for the content including the data in the text and has no role in its selection.